Канцара В.Д.ЉЋЏ€џ
|
Voir Note explicative See Explanatory Note См. Пояснительную заметку
COUR EUROPéENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЙ СУД ПО ПРАВАМ PARTЕЛОВЕКА
Conseil de l’Europe – Council of Europe – Совет Европы Strasbourg, France – Страсбург, Франция
ReQuête STATEMENT ЗАЯВЛЕНИЕ
рrésentée en application de l’article 34 de la Convention européenne des Droits de l’Homme, аinsi que des articles 45 et 47 du Règlement de la Cour в соответствии со Статьей 34 Европейской Конвенции по Правам PARTеловека, а также Статьями 45 и 47 Регламента Суда
IMPORTANT: La présente requête est un document juridique et peut affecter vos droits et obligations. ВАЖНО: Это заявление является юридиpartеским документом и может затронуть Ваши права и обязанности
І - LES PARTIES СТОРОНЫ
А. LE ReqUéRANT/LA ReqUéRANTE THE APPLICANT The citizen of Ukraine KANTSARA Valery Dmitrievich
(Renseignements à fournir concernant le requérant et son représentant éventuel) (Данные о заявителе и его представителе, если таковой имеется)
Nom de famille (фамилия заявителя) KANTSARA .Prénom (s) (имя и отpartество) Valery Dmitrievich
Sexe: masculin/féminin Пол: мужской/женский male 3.
5. Date et lieu de naissance. Дата и место Births on March, 17th, 1959, settlement Andreevka, Balakleevsky area, the Kharkov area 6. Domicile /Постоянный адрес Lenin's street д.82, sq. 56, Alchevsk, Luhansk area, 94214, Ukraine, 7. Tel.No/Номер телефона . 0 38 06442 (42566), (53787), (46693) Adresse actuelle (si différente de 6.) Нынешний адрес (если отлиpartается от 6.) The prospectus of Metallurgists, 48 the attached premise, Alchevsk, Luhansk area, 94206, Ukraine. 9. Nom et prénom du/de la représentant(e)*. Фамилия и имя представителей* 10. Profession du/de la représentant(e). Род занятий представителей 11. Adresse du/de la représentant(e) Адрес представителя Tel.No/Номер телефона Fax No/Номер факса
В. LA HAUTE PARTIE CONTRACTANTE ВЫСОКАЯ ДОГОВАРИВАЮЩАЯСЯ СТОРОНА The state Ukraine_____________________
ІІ - EXPOSé DES FAITS Statement of the facts The given statement we ask to consider from last variant of the laser disk directed to your address if the such is available.
Since 1997 Kantsara Valery Dmitrievich (further Kantsara V. D) and Marijchuk Natalia Valerevna (further Marijchuk N.V.), as workers of private enterprise of firm (further PEF) "Kallista", PEF "Promsnab", PEF "Promresursy", PEF "TorIDvyi centre", PEF "Dealine" (the application № – the reference opens on a laser disk, further – rld. №) ((805)1) and as citizens of the state Ukraine repeatedly addressed in various law-enforcement and judicial bodies of Ukraine, for the purpose of protection of the legitimate rights and interests, and as, the rights and interests of the specified enterprises and their workers about what it is in more details stated in rld.№94. In 2004y. Kantsara Valery Dmitrievich on presidential elections of Ukraine in Luhansk area has supported V.A.Jushchenko against existing corruption in state, judicial authority and law enforcement bodies. With that end in view Kantsara V. D operated on behalf of the Luhansk regional party organisation IN "Batkivshchina", on the basis of the power of attorney from 03.01.2004y (rld.№2). According to the power of attorney from 01.09.2004y. ( Документ2 rld.№ (221)3), the given out Luhansk regional party organisation IN "Batkivshchina", Kantsara V. D had the right to the reference in public authorities, local IDvernment, the enterprise, establishment, the organisation of all patterns of ownership in interests of the party organisation IN "Batkivshchina"; public statements in support of the candidate on a post of the President of Ukraine Jushchenko V. A on behalf of the party organisation IN "Batkivshchina"; carrying out in interests of the party organisation IN "Batkivshchina" public actions, public actions, press conferences for mass-media. Kantsara V. D's given rights actively used, agitating for the candidate on a post of the President of Ukraine Jushchenko V. A. In 2004 Kantsara V. D has acted as the initiator of creation of Alchevsky branch of committee of national rescue and protection of constitutional laws of Ukraine, being guided by an appeal of the candidate on a post of the President of Ukraine Jushchenko V. A to carry out active actions on a fight against corruption in authorities and preparing falsification of presidential elections of Ukraine from outside opponents. Kantsara V. D was the chairman of Committee of national rescue, its assistants – Marijchuk Natalia Valerevna, Smartly Ivan Mifodievich. Numerous references in the state, law-enforcement and judicial bodies of the chairman of Committee of national rescue of Kantsara V. D, its assistants – Marijchuk N. V, Bojko I.M. – on protection of the rights and interests of the enterprises and their workers, in the pre-election company and after it: 1. Concerning forgery of lists of voters at elections of the President of Ukraine to the first and second round and as, about suppression of separative tendencies, the Alchevsky branch of committee of national rescue and protection of constitutional laws of Ukraine which chairman was Kantsara V. D, to state structures had been directed a considerable quantity of references, including: – The statement for excitation of criminal case from 03.12.2004года (rld.№4 Выборы-2004. Документы, заявления. Конференция 2005. (208)); – The statement for excitation of criminal case from 05.12.2004года (rld.№5 Выборы-2004. Документы, заявления. Конференция 2005. (208)); – The statement from 24.01.2005года about granting of the information on consideration of the statement for excitation of criminal case from 03.12.2004y. (rld.№6 Выборы-2004. Документы, заявления. Конференция 2005. (208)); – The statement for excitation of criminal case from 19.04.2005года (rld.№7 Выборы-2004. Документы, заявления. Конференция 2005. (208)); – The statement for excitation of criminal case from 25.06.2005года (rld.№8 Выборы-2004. Документы, заявления. Конференция 2005. (208)); On numerous references of employees of Alchevsky branch of committee of national rescue and protection of constitutional laws of Ukraine, following answers have been received: To Kantsara V. D and Bojko I.M., as chairman of Alchevsky branch of committee of national rescue and protection of constitutional laws of Ukraine and its assistant – The answer from secretary of the President of Ukraine from 02.03.2005y. №03-02/464, about a direction of the reference of Kantsara V. D concerning infringements of the selective legislation in Luhansk area during elections of the President of Ukraine in 2004 and their non-admission during elections in the Supreme Rada of Ukraine in 2006 in the State Office of Public Prosecutor of Ukraine and the Central election committee (rld.№9); – The answer from secretary of the President of Ukraine from 02.03.2005y. №03-02/464, about a direction of the reference from 25.01.2005y. Concerning infringements of the selective legislation in Luhansk area during elections of the President of Ukraine in 2004 and their non-admission during elections in the Supreme Rada of Ukraine in 2006 in the State Office of Public Prosecutor of Ukraine and the Central election committee (rld.№10); – The answer from the State Office of Public Prosecutor of Ukraine from 11/19/2004 of year №07/1-r about a direction of the complaint of Kantsara V. D concerning infringement of the legislation on elections and on other questions to the public prosecutor of Luhansk area (rld.№11); – The answer from Office of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk area from 16.02.2005y. №7/1-3136-05 to the vice-president of Alchevsky branch of Committee of national rescue Bojko I.M. about a direction for carrying out of check as item 97 CPK of Ukraine, the reference of representatives of Alchevsky branch of committee of national rescue concerning forgery of lists of voters during carrying out of the first and second rounds of voting of presidential elections of Ukraine – to the public prosecutor Luhansk , to the public prosecutor the Red Beam, to the public prosecutor of Revalsky area (rld.№12); – The answer from Office of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk from 21.02.2005y. №26вих to the vice-president of Alchevsky branch of Committee of national rescue Bojko I.M. about a direction for carrying out of check as item 97 CPK of Ukraine, the reference of representatives of Alchevsky branch of committee of national rescue concerning forgery of lists of voters during carrying out of the first and second rounds of voting at elections of the President of Ukraine – to the public prosecutor of Perevalsky area (rld.№13); – The answer from the State Office of Public Prosecutor of Ukraine from 17.03.2005y. ³07/1/1r about a direction of the reference of Kantsara V. D about infringement of the legislation on presidential elections of Ukraine in Luhansk area and on other questions и/о to the public prosecutor of Luhansk area to the senior adviser of justice Kozjakovu I.M. (rld.№14); – The answer from Office of Public Prosecutor the Red Beam from 22.02.2005y. №07-107 vh-05 to the vice-president of Alchevsky branch of Committee of national rescue Bojko I.M. about a direction for check carrying out on территориальности the reference of representatives of Alchevsky branch of committee of national rescue concerning forgery of lists of voters during carrying out of the first and second rounds of voting at elections of the President of Ukraine – to the public prosecutor of Perevalsky area (rld.№15); – The answer from Office of Public Prosecutor of Alchevsk from 03.08.2005y. №10/70-3384 to the vice-president of Alchevsky branch of Committee of national rescue Bojko I.M. about absence of the bases for acceptance of measures of public prosecutor's reaction and as that the person who has made an arson of a premise of the belonging Kantsara V. D, is not established till now (rld.№16); Kantsara V. D's specified political position became the basis for uncooperative altitude display to Kantsara V. D, from outside opponents who held high posts in a management Alchevsk, Luhansk area. As it is known, the overwhelming majority of the population of east regions of Ukraine, including, in Luhansk area actively supported the candidate on a post of the President of Ukraine Yanukovych V. F. Concerning supporters of other candidates, especially Jushchenko V. A, both the population, and the power showed aggression and showed obvious discontent with Kantsara V. D's such political position. I consider that such relation has formed the basis for an arson (12/24/2004 of year) the building belonging to Kantsara V. D on the right of a private property in which the shop is partially located. ((2603) 17 – п. 6.1, 6.2., 6.3, 6.4). Further, Kantsara V. D. political position as the public person, in Alchevsk, caused strong discontent from outside local authorities bodies, became one of the rendering bases on it of psychological pressure and intimidation, as political opponent. Kantsara V. D considers that the further events connected with its attraction as accused on criminal case, have a direct bearing on its political activity and desire of bodies of local authorities completely to eliminate political opposition in his face in Alchevsk. Even after presidential elections of Ukraine on which has won Jushchenko V. A, the relation to representatives of the "orange" political block has not changed, as in authorities on places the same persons continued to remain. We defended the rights and the rights of the enterprises: – Before corporation «Industrial union of Donbass» which on the first, second round organised in Alchevsk excesses (rld.№18) which interests in Alchevsk represented g-yes Risuhin and Begecheva; – Before OKP "Luhansk vodprom" which interests were represented by Mr. Pavlik and etc. And when all specified above the Lord have taken places in «an orange command», IN "Batkivshchina", a country council, the Supreme Rada of Ukraine our problems by 2006 were increased. In 2006 Kantsara V. D stood on a post of a mayor of Alchevsk that proves to be true the certificate №1 from 14.02.2009y. ( Фото40а cлд. (210) №19). On March, 26th 2006y. Elections of a mayor of Alchevsk have taken place. Power cutoff to the buildings belonging to the citizen of Kantsara V. D became reaction of the authorities to balloting: – To the address: Alchevsk, avenue of Metallurgists, 48 – since March, 22nd 2006y. On the present; – To the address: Alchevsk, street Chapaeva, 51-in – 07.09.2006y. That proves to be true Bojko I.M.'s statements and Fighting Century Н ( Фото 4 и 5 cлд. (234) №20), ( Фото 4 и 5 cлд. (234) №21); – At the vice-president of Alchevsky branch of Committee of national rescue Bojko I.M., the pensioner, without legal grounds the electric power in apartment which has been included in some months – without any explanations has been disconnected. Kantsara V. D's specified political activity became a consequence of the organisation concerning it forged by the power, law-enforcement, judicial bodies of criminal case №10/04/8017. During the selective company a measure of Alchevsk, after power cutoff to a building belonging on the right of a private property of Kantsara V. D – The decision from 25.03.2006y. The senior inspector of investigatory department of tax militia of the State tax administration in Leshchenko O. A's Luhansk area (further the inspector Leshchenko O. A) (слд.№22 (447)) has reanimated and has accepted to the manufacture criminal case №10/04/8017. Plot of the forged criminal case №10/04/8017 – cancellation of far-fetched re-registration PEF "Vector" which has entailed, according to the investigation, non-payment of taxes PEF "Avers" that does not represent the facts and to the existing legislation of Ukraine: 1. Re-registration cancellation actually had no place ((449)23) 2. Even in case the re-registration would take place also it has been cancelled – the Law of Ukraine «About the tax to the added cost» paragraph 2 item 7.4.5 provides liquidation of the enterprise and financial sanctions to the enterprise. The authorities of Luhansk area knew about it, but for the purpose of a political revenge, reyderstva, demonstrations of the omnipotence, impunity of the criminal acts have begun Kantsara V. D, Marijchuk N.V., Bojko I.M.'s prosecution.
Criminal case №10/04/8017 – derivative of criminal cases №0091/04, №0092/04, 10/04/8017 and 10/04/8017-2 to what criminal case materials testify the following: – The decision of Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area from 05.08.2003y., which constituent documents PEF "Vector" are recognised by void from the date of a re-registration from 30.09.2002y. ((449)23) – The decision from 30.01.2004y. The inspector from Brjankovsky ID PDI Chaloj L.F. had been raised criminal case №0091/04 upon creation of fictitious enterprise PEF "Vector" (rld.№24); – The decision from 25.05.2004y. The chief of the Investigation Division of the tax police department state of Alchevsk tax police ( further IDTPD state of Alchevsk TP) the captain of tax militia Cherepenin S.S. filed and agreed to its production of a criminal case №10/04/8017 on the fact of deliberate evasion from payment of taxes by officials PEF of "Avers" to signs of structure of a crime provided by item 212 CK of Ukraine for the sum 190 870 UAH. (rld.№25); – The decision from 25.05.2004y. the chief IDTPPTD state of Alchevsk TP the captain of tax militia Cherepenin S.S. filed and agreed to its production of a criminal case upon deliberate evasion from payment of taxes by officials PEF of "Avers" to signs of structure of a crime provided by item 212 CK of Ukraine for the sum 142 588 UAH. (Criminal case №10/04/8017) (слд.№27,24 документ №1 (839)); – The decision from May, 25th 2004y. the inspector Brjankovsky ID PDI Chalaja L.F. criminal case №0092-04 under the item 191part.3 CK Ukraine and under item 205 part.2 CK Ukraine on the establishment of a fictitious company referred to another investigative in Alchevsky State Department of Tax Police – list case3 criminal case volume 1 (слд.№27,24 документ №1 (839)27, rld.№24). At the same time, the Certificate of reception-transfer of materials of criminal case, no. – The decision from June, 15th, 2004 the chief IDTPPTD state of Alchevsk TP the captain of tax militia Cherepenin S.S. unites criminal cases №0091/04, 10/04/8017 and 10/04/8017-2 in one manufacture and assigns one number №10/04/8017 already under the item 212part.3 CK Ukraine (list case5 criminal case volume 1 – (rld.№28). Thus, absolutely ignores criminal case materials №0092-04 on which active investigatory actions and on which in criminal case materials there is no decision about criminal case excitation №0092-04 were conducted. 06.12.2006y. the complaint to the decision has been submitted to Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area of Marijchuk N.V. from 25.05.2004y. about criminal case excitation ((889)29). 06.12.2006y. the complaint to the decision has been submitted to Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area of Kantsara V. D from 25.05.2004y. About criminal case excitation ((889)29). 21.12.2006y. specification has been directed to Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area of Kantsara V. D under the complaint ((889)30). The decision Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area from 25.12.2006y. Kantsara V. D's complaint to the decision from 25.05.2004y. About criminal case excitation has been left without satisfaction. ((905)31 – p. 215-216 t. № 5 criminal cases). Definition of Appeal court of Luhansk area from 16.02.2007y. The decision Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area from 25.12.2006y. It has been left without change, Kantsara V. D's appeal complaint – without satisfaction ((905)32 p. 217-218 t. № 5 criminal cases). 7/31/2006 of year on IDTPPTD state of Alchevsk TP in Safonovym I.B.'s Luhansk area (further inspector Sofonov I.B.) which, had obviously criminal intention on bringing to criminal liability obviously innocent and application of tortures – concerning Kantsara V. D has been taken out by the inspector the decision about attraction as accused where the inspector Leshchenko O. A has noted – «is acquainted, a copy is handed over, explained, the signature has refused, ….». About attraction obviously innocent, to the criminal liability, for the purpose of racket and рейдерства, following facts testify: – Date of removal of the decision from 31.07.2006y. And a mark – «it is acquainted, a copy it is handed over, explained, the signature has refused, ….» Leshchenko O. A executed by the inspector coincides with date of stay of Kantsara V. D with a family outside of Ukraine (with 7/15/2006 of year on 8/12/2006 of year) to what the mark in the passport for travel abroad (testifies.((151)33). Same afternoon (31.07.2006y.), inspector Safonovym I.B. had been took out the decision about the announcement of search of the accused Kantsara V. D ((851)34); – Figures, so-called, the shortages specified in the decision from 31.07.2006y. About attraction as accused were are taken from the Certificate of documentary check not eligible to travel abroad №184/23/30921623 from 09.08.2006y. PEF "Avers" «concerning observance of requirements of tax laws on payment of the tax to the added cost (further the VAT) from 01.10.2002y. On 30.06.2003y.» ((451) 35) (further the Certificate from 09.08.2006y.), i.e., actually for 9 days, to the introduction of the Certificate from 09.08.2006y. In validity the given circumstance as proves to be true a testimony of inspector Safonov I.B. in judicial session of Lenin district court of Luhansk 04.07.2008y. ("Strasb_1/Записи%20судебных%20заседаний%20Лен%20суда/Остальные%20записи%20на%20камертоне/camertonecd.exe">(863)36 – audio records of judicial sessions) In criminal case materials №1-1027/07 (earlier №10/04/8017), there is a petition of lawyer Rubana for Safonova I.B.'s attraction to the criminal liability for forgery at official registration of papers, for the purpose of Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V.'s illegal capture under guards which is not considered till now by Lenin district court of Luhansk ((863)37).
06.05.2006y. in a building belonging on the right of a private property of Kantsara V. D, workers of tax militia of Alchevsk on the basis of the illegal decision about manufacture of a search from 03.05.2006y., the public prosecutor of Luhansk area authorised by the assistant Gorpenjukom, had been conducted an illegal search (слд.№38, дело П-202/07 или 1-77/09 (553)). Carrying out of the specified illegal search has been fixed by law enforcement bodies by means of a videocamera.
The beginning of consideration of criminal case was 17.04.2007y. in Alchevsk city court of Luhansk area. In 2007 under Kantsara V. D's petition «About carrying over of consideration of materials of criminal case« in any other court … »» business has been transferred in Lenin district court of Luhansk as the Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area has been extremely unfriendly adjusted to Kantsara V. D and its assistant in committee of national rescue, to the lawful representative in state, judicial and Marijchuk N.V.'s law enforcement bodies ((3439)39). In Alchevsk city court of Luhansk area obviously illegal decision from 8/5/2003 of year was accepted and according to a testimony of inspector Safonov I.B. in Leninsk district court of Luhansk – them advised in Alchevsk city court of Luhansk area. In Leninsk district court of Luhansk since June, 2006 was without consideration Kantsara V. D's complaint from 26.05.2006y. on the decision about carrying out of an illegal search and on actions of the senior inspector of branch of IDTPPTD state of Alchevsk TP STA in Leshchenko O. A's Luhansk area, the assistant to the public prosecutor of Luhansk area Garpenjuka A.V. as chapter 22 of item 234 CPK of Ukraine. (case № 1-77/09 earlier П-202/07 (слд.№40, документ №1, дело П-202/07 или 1-77/09 (553)) that has formed the basis for transfer of materials of criminal case to Lenin district court of Luhansk .
17.09.2009y., after Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V.'s numerous petitions for viewing of videorecording of an illegal search, in judicial session of Lenin district court of Luhansk , videorecording of an illegal search has been seen: - Absence of a videocamera at the moment of an input of workers of tax militia in Kantsara V. D's building, and inclusion of a videocamera after Kantsara V. D's arrival to a building, has been used for the statement that Kantsara V. D was present on the search beginning; - More than third of time of record of Kantsara V. D demands to read the decision about search carrying out (слд.№38, дело П-202/07 или 1-77/09 (553)). To it refuse to familiarise with the decision about search carrying out (11.01.38, 11.05.54 time of videorecording), under a pretext that it can be destroyed Kantsara V. D, it very valuable and for it the captain of tax militia of Alchevsk Kovalenko V. I will be punished by bodies of Office of Public Prosecutor (10.58.33 time of videorecording); – Throughout Kantsara V. D's all search and others said Leshchenko O. A and Kovalenko V. I that they without a judgement are in a building not lawfully; – Kovalenko V. I informs that Kantsara V. D on the decision about search carrying out has refused the signature (11.18.10 time of videorecording). Specified "know-how" of workers of tax militia – Kovalenko V. I, Safonova I.B., Leshchenko O. A – «has refused the signature» repeatedly is applied in criminal case when Kantsara V. D has not been acquainted with any document. To law enforcement bodies the specified formulation has allowed to fabricate two variants of criminal case – for acquaintance and for transfer to court. Probably, today there is a third edition of materials of criminal case as in execution of item 315 CPK of Ukraine business has illegally been transferred the same inspector Safonovu I.B. (to the witness on criminal case), in infringement of the sounded decision of Lenin district court of Luhansk from 26.12.2008y. about transfer of criminal case for execution it agree item 315 CPK of Ukraine in Office of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk area ((496)41) and without the petition of lawyer Rubana, for attraction of inspector Safonova I.B. to the criminal liability (rld. № 37); - 11.17.40 (videorecording time) (rld.№42) – Kantsara V. D asks the worker of tax militia Kovalenko V. I to take in hands; - 11.28.44 (videorecording time) – Kovalenko V. I repeatedly during an illegal search defies that if its actions are illegal, he is ready to answer. In a sentence from 07.09.2009y. On business № 1-406 on Sharojkina R. S and Chivilenko I.V.'s charge (the similar scenario of a search in other place, after acceptance of unpunished participation in a search of my premise) it is specified that for carrying out of an illegal search they have arrived under Kovalenko V. I's instructions ((220)43). Sharojkin R. S and Chivilenko I.V. wrongly believed that for the crimes committed by them concerning another's private property, the fault part will be transferred Kovalenko V. I that has not occurred. I.e., they counted that Kovalenko V. I will bear responsibility for the illegal order. Similarly workers of tax militia of Alchevsk – Muma, Safonov I.B., Leshchenko O. A, asserting in judicial sessions that they executed the order of the higher heads, judges, believe that will duck out for crimes concerning Kantsara V. D's located to the address private property: Alchevsk, avenue of Metallurgists, 48. For this lawlessness they consider that the higher heads and judges will incur responsibility – that is not provided by the law; – Other part of a video topic (rld.№42) are numerous breaks in record – knocking over from 20 minutes till 2 o'clock (12.42.29, 14.37.51, 17.58.07 time of videorecording), the dark screen, our requests to be presented (10.50.37. 11.10.08 time of videorecording), requirements of presence of the inspector (10.55.24 time of videorecording), our requirements not to enclose documents and the press (11.02.54, 11.07.02 time of videorecording), not acceptable expressions (17.17.22 time of videorecording) workers of tax militia, Kantsara V. D's remark – to behave decently. At weak light диодных small lamps or in full darkness, workers of tax militia without survey and inventory drawing up load paper for recycling in polyethylene bags (10.57.17 time of videorecording). Search in the dark understood (10.45.30 time of videorecording). The specified 16 persons conducting an illegal search, dispersed on all building to what their reports on videorecording (16.56.01 time of videorecording) testify. - 14.41.33 (videorecording time if does not open to establish klcodec250f.exe from a disk) (rld.№42) – the beginning of personal inspection (robbery) of Kantsara V. D which says that workers of tax militia without a judgement (11.12.00 time of videorecording) are here illegally; - 14.41.46 (videorecording time) workers of tax militia of Alchevsk offered girls (to Hvatova, Sheptenko) to leave. Kantsara V. D on the given statement has made the protest, having told to workers of tax militia of Alchevsk that – «you here without witnesses will work wonders».
- 14.41.50 (videorecording time) Kantsara V. D has notified workers of tax militia of Alchevsk that all their actions (including a search) – are not lawful. - 14.42.40 (videorecording time) Kantsara V. D the next time says that workers of tax militia of Alchevsk here is not lawful, and that it will not help them with it – «I will not rise». On Kantsara V. D's given statement workers of tax militia of Alchevsk, for the purpose of rendering of psychological pressure, have lifted it from a chair and have tumbled down on a floor. At this time Hvatova says that concerning Kantsara V. D apply force of 7 persons. At Kantsara V. D hands were in pockets that the next time confirms absence of resistance from outside Kantsara V. D during an illegal search. - 14.43.00 (videorecording time) Hvatova speaks is not a search, is an arbitrariness. «7 persons have attacked, having applied force it is normal?» Kantsara V. D is tumbled down on a floor, for the purpose of deliberate causing of a severe pain and suffering have put on Kantsara V. D's head a jacket in this connection, to it not than was to breathe. - 14.43.14 (videorecording time) – the voice of one of workers of tax militia of Alchevsk is audible – «Oleg (Leshchenko O. A) take from the safe. Is. Keys from doors. From doors is. All!». - 14.43.20 (videorecording time) – the worker of tax militia of Alchevsk shows keys in two hands. - 14.43.27 (videorecording time) it is audible a voice of one of workers of tax militia of Alchevsk which ascertains – «keys from the safe, keys from doors in pockets at Kantsary V. D» Show keys. According to videorecording, keys from the safe and rooms of a building workers of tax militia of Alchevsk have shown in 24 seconds after the beginning of application of violence. Despite it, for the purpose of deliberate causing of a severe pain and Kantsara V. D's suffering continue to break hands 14.43.48 (videorecording time). - 14.43.58 (videorecording time) Kovalenko searches for handcuffs in spite of the fact that Kantsara V. D does not render any resistance. Without having found handcuffs, workers of tax militia of Alchevsk, acting in official quality, for the purpose of rendering not only psychological pressure, but also causing of a physical pain have decided to take advantage of a belt (on videorecording it is visible that who that распоясывается) for linkage of hands and feet, (14. 44. 47; 14.44.55 (videorecording time) to the person who did not render any resistance. Kantsara V. D, testing a severe pain in hands says that «will suffice to pull» (some times). According to the Convention against tortures and kinds of the reference another severe, brutal or humiliating advantage and punishment by the General Assembly of the United Nations accepted on December, 10th, 1984 by torture it is defined – "any action to which to any person the severe pain or suffering is deliberately caused, physical or moral to receive from it or from the data or recognition third party, to punish it for action which was made by it or the third party or of which fulfilment it is suspected, and also to intimidate or force it or the third party, or for any reason based on discrimination of any character when such pain or suffering is caused by the state official or other person acting in official, quality, either on instigation, or from their permission or a tacit consent". - 14.45.20 (videorecording time) Hvatova says to workers of tax militia of Alchevsk that Kantsara V. D is sick. - 14.45.25 (videorecording time) – workers of tax militia have removed at Kantsara V. D from a hand a IDld watch, on what Kantsara V. D and Hvatovoj S.V.'s requirement 14.45.39 (videorecording time) that them have returned has followed. Through time hours of Kantsara V. D have reluctantly returned and have photographed on the chamber 14.45.53 (videorecording time) - 14.46.14 (videorecording time) – Kantsara V. D speaks – «untie to hell. Has made a search? Has played enough?», on what Kovalenko with insult tells - «Cho has played enough?». - 14.46.34 (videorecording time) workers of tax militia, having achieved the objective – rendering as psychological pressure so causings of a physical pain have untied Kantsara V. D hands and feet. Kantsara V. D has risen from a floor. Kantsara V. D pants. - 14.49.38 (videorecording time) by workers of tax militia of Alchevsk have been illegally withdrawn from the press safe – PEF "Promsnab" PEF of "Promressursy", PEF "Kallista", PEF "Dealine", PEF "Shopping centre", PEF «the Pole is old». - 17.10.56 (videorecording time) workers of tax militia had been made breaking of doors of premises of Kantsara V. D with application фомок. 26.05.2006y. Kantsara V. D has been submitted to Lenin district court of Luhansk the complaint to the decision about carrying out of an illegal search and on actions of the senior inspector Leshchenko O. A's Luhansk area, the assistant to the public prosecutor of Luhansk area Garpenjuka A.V. as chapter 22 of item 234 CPK of Ukraine. (case № 1-77/09 (earlier П-202/07 (rld. № 40 p. 1., p. 2, p. 3)) which illegally is not considered till now. Deliberate not consideration of the complaint from 26.05.2006y. On the decision about carrying out of an illegal search, judges of Lenin district court of Luhansk Ostrovsky and Goncharovoj, has led to that illegality of a search is not considered till now, the given complaint is attached to criminal case materials №10/04/8017. The withdrawn paper for recycling and documents are illegally used, now, for a substantiation of the brought accusations in Kantsara V. D's relation. Wrongfulness no complaint of illegal search and on this basis Kantsara V. D's illegal arrest has entailed, including, not performance of obligations of Kantsara V. D on ГП «the Krivorozhsky heating plant» ((1001)44)) which made more than 60 000 000 UAH. At any sentence which has been taken out by Lenin district court of Luhansk concerning Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk – 16 workers of tax militia, public prosecutors and judges should be responsible for carrying out of an illegal search 06.05.2006y. In a premise belonging to Kantsara V. D on the right of a private property, located to the address: Alchevsk, avenue of Metallurgists, 48 and groundless application concerning Kantsara V. D law enforcement bodies of measures of physical influence.
31.07.2006y. Inspector Safonovym I.B. in Lenin district court of Luhansk had been directed representation about a reference to the court for decision removal about detention accused, on purpose доставления it to court for election of a preventive punishment in the form of holding in custody ((362)45). 09.08.2006y. The Lenin district court of Luhansk had been took out the decision about доставлении by Kantsara V. D in Lenin district court of Luhansk , ((806)46). At the same time, the sanction on the maintenance under guards in infringement of jurisdiction and business of the decision of Lenin district court of Luhansk available in materials from 09.08.2006y., affirmed Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area (rld.№47), which Kantsara V. D for political views and as, upholding of the interests by it and interests of the enterprises in which it worked, has been extremely unfriendly adjusted concerning Kantsara V. D. In Alchevsk city court of Luhansk area, contrary to the legislation of Ukraine, regarding jurisdiction, in the presence of lawyer Trojan the illegal decision on application concerning Kantsara V. D – a preventive punishment in the form of the maintenance under guards was accepted. Lawyer Trojan has assured Kantsara V. D that will appeal against against the given decision which was illegal. In the conditions of the maintenance in TEMPORARY DETENTION, in the absence of appropriate illumination in the chamber ((1886)48), Kantsara V. D believed that the decision will be appealed against by the lawyer. At the same time, Kantsara V. D has been sounded the pledge sum – 100 000 UAH., with which Kantsara V. D's family had no. For gathering of the specified sum of Kantsara Z.I. has been compelled to sell the truck crane which arrest and still has not been put, to occupy an essential part of money resources that them it has appeared enough for preventive punishment change. Thus, was ten-day term on giving of the appeal complaint is passed. Kantsara V. D has been compelled to find the new lawyer – the Weaver under which petition, in 1,5 months Kantsara V. D has been changed a preventive punishment from holding in custody to pledge and a subscription about невыезде 9/6/2006 Kantsara V. D has been detained, to what the detention report (testifies. (902)49) also it is placed in temporary detention Alchevsky ID PDI of Ukraine in Luhansk area to what the reference of inspector Safonova I.B. from 06.09.2006г testifies. Addressed to the chief of Alchevsky ID PDI of Ukraine in Luhansk area, and then in remand Starobelska. (rld.№50). With 06.09.2006y. On 19.10.2006y. Kantsara V. D was in custody in REMAND Starobelska. ((468)51). Now, the preventive punishment is changed. On a state of health ((469)52) Kantsara V. D is released under pledge (rld.№53) and a subscription about невыезде. For Kantsara V. D's clearing from under guards and a subscription about невыезде Kantsara V. D has been brought pledge – 100 000 UAH. That is inadequate to severity level of an incriminated crime ((2603)54 – item 3.8) and to Kantsara V. D's behaviour. ((2603)54 – item 1.4 – according to the President of Ukraine that if citizens of Ukraine were figurants in criminal case, it already people almost судимые and if to you have organised REMAND and the defendant it, probably, is equated to the recidivist). In TEMPORARY DETENTION (further TD) and REMAND concerning Kantsara V. D the Minimum standard rules of the reference with the prisoners, accepted on the first Congress of the United Nations under the prevention of criminality and the reference with offenders from August, 30th 1955г have been broken., about what Kantsara V. D had been put in the statement. The specified statement from 11/8/2006 of year ((1886)48), available in criminal case materials – till now it is not considered by law-enforcement and judicial bodies, including, application by a consequence under the direction of bodies of Office of Public Prosecutor of tortures, in the form of the cold chamber that session 28.10.2008y proves to be true a testimony of the assistant to the public prosecutor of Alchevsk ShpakovskoID A.J. in judicial. (rld. № 36 – audio records of judicial sessions) Practice of the European court under human rights establishes that illegal or without sufficient on that of the bases the premise of the person in TEMPORARY DETENTION or in REMAND is subject to qualify as torture that is provided item 3 of the Convention on protection of human rights and basic freedom. About rough infringement of the Minimum standard rules of the reference with the prisoners, accepted on the first Congress of the United Nations under the prevention of criminality and the reference with offenders from August, 30th 1955y., at holding in custody, Kantsara V. D had been put in the statement from 08.11.2006y. ((1886)48). In TEMPORARY DETENTION Alchevsk concerning Kantsara V. D tortures have been applied and the Minimum standard rules of the reference with the prisoners, accepted on the first Congress of the United Nations under the prevention of criminality and the reference with offenders from August, 30th 1955г are broken., namely - Kantsara V. D has been placed with arrested persons under articles – drawing of heavy physical injuries, drugs, rape, murder …, the recidivists sick of a tuberculosis, an epilepsy condemned, smokers (Kantsara V. D not smoker); - In chamber IVS of 10-12 m. sq. it has been placed from 5 to 8 persons, ceiling height 2,2м; - In the chamber there was no admissible level of natural and electric illumination – in the chamber №1,4,6 constant twilight that in a consequence has led to considerable deterioration at Kantsara V. D of sight; - In the chamber №1 at a premise in it Kantsara V. D was absent window остекление and it was cold, on Kantsara V. D's four requests to eliminate infringements - personnel TEMPORARY DETENTION of Alchevsk, including the public prosecutor of Alcheska did not react. The given circumstance has been confirmed by a testimony of the assistant to the public prosecutor of Alchevsk ShpakovskoID A.J., in judicial session 28.10.2008y. (rld. № 36); - In the chamber №4 and д.р. There was no ventilation – air in a ventilating outlet passed from a number of the located window for a lamp, other volume of the chamber was not aired; - There were no beds (two-story plank beds), bedside tables, радиопродCKтор. Sleeping accessories, means of personal hygiene have not stood out, in помывке a bath (soul) refused. In the chamber the mattress represented an insanitary heap of cotton wool, it was impossible to touch a pillow because of its insanitary condition and obvious signs use by her faces in their detention for abusing alcohol. Only after the adaptation polyethylene кулька under a pillowcase on a pillow and absence of other possibilities of Kantsara V. D has been compelled to use it. In the chamber there were bugs; - In TEMPORARY DETENTION there was no possibility of walks, and furthermore conditions for physical exercises; - In the presence of Kantsara V. D arrested person Abdullaev Р has been beaten building киянкой - for the request to call the doctor; – To a hall of Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area (the judge - the chairman Zalmanov V. M) during Kantsara V. D's judicial session was in handcuffs and to it has been refused a summer residence of explanatories; - In TEMPORARY DETENTION there was no possibility to listen to radio, to watch TV, read books andnewspapers; - At visiting of Office of Public Prosecutor and court of a hand of Kantsara V. D have been held down behind the back. The escort was carried out as much as possible in a pointed manner; - In автозаках, at quantity of sedentary places 6-7, 12-15 persons with things on distance to 50км were transported. With the subsequent expectations of a Ry stage lasting many hours; - Kantsara V. D's moving was carried out in heavy physical and moral conditions: in the conditions of narrowness, absence of ventilation, illumination, hygiene. The person on remand at moving within days does not receive a food; - For refusal to perform work on repair TEMPORARY DETENTION and food distribution, women under investigation to women, including Marijchuk N.V., disconnected in the chamber light. The above-stated, testifies to deliberate, complex and system actions of investigating bodies, bodies of Office of Public Prosecutor, the judicial bodies acting in official quality – directed on рейдерский capture of the property of Kantsara V. D, rendering on Kantsara V. D of psychological pressure, causing to it a physical pain by application of tortures: – For upholding of the legitimate rights by it, interests of the enterprises, by giving of numerous references in judicial and law enforcement bodies; – For political views distinct from accepted in Luhansk area in 2004y. Applying tortures to Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V., the consequence and bodies of Office of Public Prosecutor obviously knew that thus have strong psychological influence on members of their families and by that, increase effect of tortures, concerning Kantsara V. D. So, in Kantsara V. D's finding in imprisonment places, on its relatives as essential psychological influence has been had: 1. At mother Kantsara V. D the neurosis which has entailed irritation of an integument therefore, on its body through clothes were visible numerous bloody проступления has developed; 2. "Compassionate" teachers at school did not miss possibility to find out from the daughter Kantsara V. D where many know it as the participant and the winner of the numerous school, city, regional, republican Olympic Games – «Where your daddy?» ((896)55); 3. For the purpose of creation большего quantities of fictitious witnesses of charge in house conditions 74-year-old mum of the wife Kantsara V. D – the deserved teacher with a poor eyesight and hearing which tens years practically did not leave the house and which is necessary for carrying now in Lenin district court of Luhansk as the inspector has specified its witness of charge has been interrogated. The specified transportation on distance of 60 km has risk – Malikovoj A.A. 28.10.2009года has transferred heart attack (rld.№56). Specified is additional psychological influence on Kantsara V. D and his family. In a case not доставления Malikovoj A.A. as the witness of charge, the Office of Public Prosecutor on the given fact will have the additional bases for the appeal appeal of a sentence. The above-stated actions of the power are directed on causing of a physical pain, Kantsara V. D's material and moral harm.
From the date of excitation, so-called, criminal case has passed seven years, and in March 2010 – 4 years from the date of its falsification by the inspector Leshchenko O. A and Safonovym I.B. Actually, in judicial bodies of the state of Ukraine (Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area, and then, Lenin district court of Luhansk ) given, so-called, criminal case is considered since April 2007y and on the present. According to the inquiry on criminal case movement ((844)57), in Alchevsk city court of Luhansk area it has been spent seven judicial sessions on the given criminal case – 4/17/2007, 5/14/2007, 5/30/2007, 8/6/2007, 8/7/2007, 9/10/2007, 10/9/2007 of year. In Lenin district court of Luhansk the given criminal case has arrived 10/25/2007 of year and has been transferred for consideration to judge Taranovoj E.P. to whom business about illegality of a search under Kantsara V. D's complaint from 26.05.2006г earlier has been transferred. The first listening to criminal case in Leninsk district court of Luhansk has been appointed on 12/13/2007 of year. To the present the Lenin district court of Luhansk had been appointed 42 judicial sessions ((844)57). Judicial sessions in Leninsk district court of Luhansk , as a rule, pass 1-2 sessions in 3-9 months. For example between judicial sessions 26.12.2008y. And 16.09.2009y. Has passed 9 months that nothing soundly. From them, have not been spent in full or broken, it agree Inquiries on movement of criminal case from 20.01.2010y. ((844)57): – Absence of Office of Public Prosecutor of 8 judicial sessions; – Absence of the inspector of Leshchenko O. A. 5 judicial sessions; – Absence of the civil Claimant 1 judicial session; – Absence of witnesses of charge of 13 judicial sessions. Total 27 judicial sessions from 42 have been actually broken, on the others 15 judicial sessions have been interrogated 10 witnesses of charge. Time of interrogation of the majority of the specified witnesses, did not exceed 10 minutes as on a question that they can explain upon Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V.'s charge in non-payment of the taxes, any of witnesses of charge has not given explanatories. There were no these explanatories and in a primary testimony that testifies to artificiality of charge, the organisation a consequence and Office of Public Prosecutor of witness mass meeting, for introduction of judicial bodies in error. Невызов the remained witnesses of charge within 4 years it is used by Office of Public Prosecutor and judicial bodies for rendering on Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V. of psychological pressure, for the purpose of drawing of additional material and moral harm. Infringement of reasonable terms of consideration of materials of criminal case as is a consequence not of realisation of a drive of witnesses of charge. According to the bill of particulars, witnesses of charge – 19 persons. Even at interrogation on one witness, in one judicial session, it is necessary – 19 judicial sessions. At the same time, after 42 appointed judicial sessions, 9 witnesses of the charge which interrogation is obligatory, till now are not interrogated. Kantsara V. D repeatedly sent statements for a drive of witnesses of charge, inspectors and the Claimant ((891)58). 06.06.2008y., 24.06.2008y. And from 06.10.2009y. The Lenin district court of Luhansk had been took out three decisions about a drive of witnesses. The specified decisions about a drive deliberately, are not executed till now ((891)58). Control of execution of the specified decisions about a drive has been assigned to Office of Public Prosecutor of Lenin area of Luhansk , Office of Public Prosecutor of Alchevsk and Office of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk area. 27.11.2009y. by us it is received ref. № a 38/stake-648 – the answer of the head of department of Luhansk city department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine in Luhansk area that «According to the notice in writing of the judge of Lenin district court of Luhansk of Taranovoj E.P. in which manufacture there is a criminal case is established that Luhansk city department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine in Luhansk area is not executed the decision of court from 06.10.2009y. About a drive of witnesses on 22.10.2009y., but the specified decision on execution in Luhansk city department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine in Luhansk area did not arrive» ((891)58). About execution of decisions from 06.06.2008y. And 24.06.2008y. In the specified answer the information is absent. 1/18/2010 of year the Lenin district court of Luhansk had been took out the next decision about a drive of witnesses ((891)59) which in order to avoid Kantsara V. D's specified in the above-stated answer situation has been compelled to send for own means the decision about a drive from 18.01.2010y. The recommended letters with the notice, on what photos of sending of decisions (rld testify. (891)60) and fiscal checks (rld.№61).
12/25/2008 of year ((496)41), the judge of Lenin district court of Luhansk had been took out the decision about the court order in which the judge put questions on substantiations of excitation of criminal case. Questions in the specified decision on which till now the consequence has not given the answer – testify to groundlessness of excitation of criminal case concerning Kantsara V. D. In judicial session 28.10.2008y. (rld. № 36 – audio records of judicial sessions - 6 mines 38 seconds of session) Taranovoj have been announced by the judge of Lenin district court of Luhansk – «to charge FROM Office of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk area …». In a written variant «to charge FROM tax militia …» (???), and actually, the specified decision the witness on business and its main falsifier – Safonov I.B. executed. Till now consideration of criminal case concerning Kantsara V. D in Leninsk district court of Luhansk заволокиpartивается Office of Public Prosecutor of Lenin area of Luhansk a way: – Numerous illegal taps from 27.03.2008y. and 02.04.2008y., declared by Office of Public Prosecutor of Lenin area of Luhansk to the judge of Lenin district court of Luhansk with the formulation «I will submit tap tomorrow …». Under the given statements for tap by the judge of Lenin district court of Luhansk Taranovoj had been took out definition about refusal in satisfaction which has been announced at judicial session 01.04.2008y. (rld. № 36 – audio records of judicial sessions (time - 00.00.56)). After two attempts to consider the specified criminal case the judge has been compelled to spend 1 session to reasonable terms in 3-9 months. And only presence at television channel "Интер" sessions that is noted in the report of technical fixing of litigation from 22.05.2008y. ("Записи%20судебных%20заседаний%20Лен%20суда/12_05_2008___22_05_2008___26_12_2008/OberigR.exe">(1343)84) and legal experts ОО «Luhansk remedial group» has relieved the judge of consideration of infinite, groundless taps of Office of Public Prosecutor, than it is broken part.1 item 6 of the Convention on protection of human rights and the basic freedom. Ref. №4 from 28.03.2008y. ((1343)62), ref. №8 from 14.04.2008y. ((1419) 63) Kantsara V. D to various state structures was directs petitions, in connection with illegal actions of the public prosecutor of Office of Public Prosecutor of Lenin area of Luhansk by Budagjantsa D.J. and the request to assist in transfer of materials of the statement for consideration by the inspector of the State Office of Public Prosecutor of Ukraine; – Not appearances of the public prosecutor of Office of Public Prosecutor of Lenin area of Luhansk in judicial session of 10/22/2009 of year, 30.10.2009года, 16.12.2009y., about what Kantsara V. D, had been put in the statement ref. №360 from 09.11.2009y. ((500)64); – Illegal replacement of public prosecutors of Office of Public Prosecutor of Lenin area of Luhansk representing interests of the state of Ukraine (Budagjantsa D.J. on Khanin), and through time – upside-down, without any bases. 10/30/2009 of year on the basis of the statement (made, probably, somewhere in a court corridor, on a knee) the public prosecutor of Office of Public Prosecutor of Lenin area of Luhansk Budagjants D.J. in criminal case №1-1027/07 replaced himself on the assistant to public prosecutor PoberezhnoID D.V. (rld.№65) which on purpose zavolokichivaniya judicial consideration the next time asked court to declare on business having rummaged. 13.11.2009y., where the state charge the new public prosecutor of Lenin area of Luhansk Poberezhnyj D.V., ostensibly, should support – public prosecutor Budagjants D.J. who under an audio record has explained the replacements in criminal case by that was: - During the appointed judicial sessions it was necessary for it to be absent on personal circumstances; - It had the right for such way not of an appearance in judicial sessions and to whom should report. In criminal case materials there is no information on notices of a management of Office of Public Prosecutor of Lenin area of Luhansk on Budagjantsa D.J. and PoberezhnoID D.V.'s separate arrangements, and as earlier – Budagjantsa D.J. and Khanin. At appropriate and timely reaction of state structures to Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V.'s references now to bodies of Office of Public Prosecutor there would be no necessity to consider this, so-called, criminal case and to try to help the persons who were actively taking part in falsification of criminal case, to avoid responsibility. At appropriate and timely reaction of state structures of Leshchenko O. A, Sharojkin R. S and Chivilenko I.V., probably, would continue to work in bodies of tax militia. Now – the inspector of tax militia of Alchevsk, the arbitration judge Leshchenko O. A, workers of tax militia of Alchevsk of Sharojkin R. S and Chivilenko I.V. for similar actions are dismissed for fulfilment of corruption actions, at carrying out of an illegal search, have been condemned by two years of imprisonment ((220)43). The public prosecutor signed the bill of particulars already with us is not present (has died), and the Office of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk area – instead of refusal of charge, continues to defend its interests in spite of the fact that the fact of obviously illegal attraction of Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V. to the criminal liability is proved. Already after the first judicial session and performance on it of two fictitious witnesses of charge (Gromova, Rudaja) ((842)66), Office of Public Prosecutor has been obliged to refuse from charge maintenance, obviously knowing, as about other falsifications of materials of criminal case: – Regarding illegal excitation of criminal case and fictitiousness of the main argument of a consequence – cancellations of re-registration PEF "Vector" which agrees criminal case materials, (volume. 1 list case 56 criminal cases) (rld.№67), ((449)23) initially had no place. Registration business PEF testifies to artificiality of a re-registration "Vector", the inquiry from the statistics, given STA Ukraine ((449)23). And about illegal conclusions of the investigation and Offices of Public Prosecutor, on the given far-fetched fact, «the Law of Ukraine testifies To the tax to the added cost» – the consequence and Office of Public Prosecutor deliberately have not been take into consideration the second paragraph of item 7.4.5 of the Law of Ukraine «About the tax to the added cost» which provides liquidation of the enterprise and responsibility in the form of the financial sanctions applied to the enterprise; – Remarks of the main state tax auditor-inspector of department of mutual relations with law enforcement bodies of Management of kontrolno-verifying work STA in Luhansk area of the adviser of tax service Vypritskoj N.G.'s 3 ranks, which at drawing up of the certificate of check from 09.08.2006y. Informed on illegitimacy of conclusions of the investigation (has confirmed in judicial session 16.10.2009y.); – Charter PEF of "Avers", where by a consequence it is ignored, who is the official, regarding delivery of the accounting documentation (charter point 6.4, p. of 40 Appendices №1 criminal cases) (rld.№68). Neither Kantsara V. D, nor Marijchuk N.V. are not officials regarding delivery of the accounting documentation; – Cards of signatures of officials PEF "Avers" (director Izvarina) in BEND – responsible regarding delivery of the accounting documentation (слд.№69, Документ №1 (838))); – Examinations №8577 from November, 13th, 2006 of signatures on declarations handed over in BEND, where in difference from the information specified in the bill of particulars ((2681)70) – Izvarina did not sign the accounting documentation is told that the signature is executed probably by Izvarinoj. The documents confirming the specified facts initially were available in criminal case materials, but on purpose рейдерского capture of property of Kantsara V. D by Offices of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk area have not been taken into consideration. The specified information, including a carrying out video topic 06.05.2006y. An illegal search – in style of gangster pogrom, was available in materials has put even before transfer of business to court. In criminal case there was twice enclosed estimation of property of Kantsara V. D which actually, is underestimated several times (t. № 3 p. 214-261) ((477)71) and which became the basic argument for creation of the given criminal case. Thus, the got Kantsara V. D in 1998 year in Alchevsk the worst long-term construction of the city authorities with a cellar filled on 1 metre with faecal dumps from the nine-floor house which in a consequence Kantsara V. D's huge efforts has turned to the pure repaired building became the latent motive of its stay in REMAND ((2573)72). Cost of square metre of the commercial area in area where Kantsara V. D's building agency of the real estate of Open Company "Гудвил" is located estimates in 600-700 US dollars. The buyer of Open Company "ATB-MARKET" and others offered 2100 US dollars. (rld.№73). The estimation of cost of a building which is available in materials of criminal case – 296 dollars of SSHA/m. sq. – is obviously underestimated. Understanding of that state structures deliberately underestimate cost of the building assumed in a consequence, to confiscate – moral harm for Kantsara V. D. For demonstration of the future possible profits from рейдерских criminal case results, law enforcement bodies as experts under the real estate have been invited and receive inquiries from the State automobile inspection (further GAI) №3588 from 08.07.2006г (rld.№74), Bureau of technical inventory (further БТИ) from 05.07.2006y. Ref. № 2450/7/26-15 (rld.№75) with transfer of motor transport and the real estate belonging to Kantsara V. D and Kantsara Z.I.specif of action have been done by law enforcement bodies long before the Certificate of check from 09.08.2006y. (rld. № 35) which appears in business, as the proof, ostensibly, non-payments of taxes. 18.09.2006y. The former senior inspector of branch of the captain of tax militia Leshchenko O. A has illegally seized Kantsara Valery Dmitrievicha's all joint property and his wives Kantsara Zoe Ivanovny, without Kantsara Z.I.'s right to a share belonging to it (50 %) in the property got during marriage, namely on: – Car GAZ-SAZ4509, гос. Number With 0397 АI; – Tractor MERCEDES-BENZ, model 1834 LS, гос. Number 02325 АТ; – MERCEDES-BENZ, model 711 D, гос. Number 02834 АТ; – Car TRAILER 10203 АМ; – The uninhabited is built in-attached premise to the address: Alchevsk, avenue MetallruIDv, 48; – Garage to the address: Alchevsk, street Chapaeva, 51б; – Apartment to the address: Alchevsk, Lenin's street, 82, sq. 56. 4/24/2008 ref. №10 Kantsara V. D, for the purpose of cancellation of the illegal decision from 18.09.2006y. About arrest imposing on property – for the further sale or transfer to rent of the property belonging to Kantsara Z.I. – Open Company "ATB-MARKET", Open Company «MD Ritejl», Open Company "РУШ", have been directed to Lenin district court of Luhansk the petition for preventive punishment change, in which Kantsara V. D asked: «– To cancel a preventive punishment in the form of a subscription about невыезде; – To cancel a preventive punishment in a kind pledge; – To return pledge; – To cancel the decision about arrest imposing on the property belonging to Kantsara V. D (a building, motor transport) »which is not considered till now. Ref. № 10-10 from 25.01.2010y. The complaint to the decision has been directed to Lenin district court of Luhansk of Kantsara V. D and Kantsara Z.I. about arrest imposing on property from 18.09.2006y. As the item of item 234,236 CPK of Ukraine, with the request to cancel the decision from 18.09.2006y. About arrest imposing on property, for restoration of the broken rights of Kantsara Z.I. – to dispose of the property belonging to it.
Owing to inactivity of bodies of Office of Public Prosecutor of Kantsara V. D has been compelled to put in the statement «about excitation of criminal case upon – forgery, falsification, racket and рейдерства workers of law enforcement bodies in Luhansk area» from 12.07.2007y. Ref. №159/738 and to it of 12 additions in which the facts illegal actions judicial, law-enforcement and state structures have been stated. The specified facts have entailed, subsequently, reaction of the state Ukraine in the form of criminal case excitation, concerning Kantsara V. D. On April, 10th, 2009 ref. № 183 Kantsara V. D, on the basis of the statement from 12.07.2007y. Ref. №159/738, the administrative claim (has been submitted. ((913)92) – the document №2) in which the losses put by the state Ukraine Kantsara of Century Д, for the sum from above 200 000 000 UAH have been shown., as of 31.12.2009y. Subsequently, the Luhansk district administrative court, has satisfied the petition of Office of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk area and definition from 29.09.2009y. Has illegally closed manufacture on business (№2-а-21832/09/1270) which Kantsara V. D has appealed against in Donetsk appeal administrative court. 22.12.2009y. On business №2-а-21832/09/1270 definition (has been taken out. – (913)92), which definition from 29.09.2009y. It has been cancelled, and business is directed on new consideration to Luhansk district administrative court that testifies to preventing judicial to bodies of the state Ukraine of protection of Kantsara V. D of the legitimate rights and interests, in connection with illegal attraction as accused, and as consequence – REMAND. 09.11.2009y. Ref. № 360 (rld. № 64) Kantsara V. D to various state structures had been sent the statement for application of tortures from outside law enforcement bodies. Preventing of Office of Public Prosecutor of access to court and preventing in research of materials, so-called criminal case №1-1027/07. Deliberate drawing of material and moral harm. About tap of Office of Public Prosecutor of Lenin area of Luhansk which supports the state charge on business №1-1027/07, according to item 58 CPK of Ukraine 24.11.2009y. Ref. №389-1 Kantsara V. D to various state structures had been sent the statement as item 97 CPK of Ukraine under item 127 CK of Ukraine – application of tortures, 162 CK Ukraine – illegality of a search of dwelling, 365 CK Ukraine – office forgery, 366 CK Ukraine – excess of office powers ((501)76). And only 1/12/2010 Kantsara V. D on the specified statements had been received two answers from the state tax administration in Luhansk area from 28.12.2009y. №3534/09-2 – on the statement ref. № 360 and from the State Office of Public Prosecutor of Ukraine from 28.12.2009y. №04/5-4244-06 on the statement №389-1. In the answer of the state tax administration in Luhansk area from 28.12.2009y. №3534/09-2 it is specified that the permission of questions stated in the statement 09.11.2009y. Ref. № 360 (rld. № 64) it is necessary to consider in court. We consider power actions illegal as, the crime stated in the statement №360, regarding an illegal search and tortures, is connected by nothing with far-fetched charges in Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V.'s relation
13.11.2009y. Ref. № 360/1 Kantsara V. D the petition for refusal of the lawyer has been submitted to Lenin district court of Luhansk , in connection with circumstances stated in the statement 360, i.e., not maintenance is brought witnesses and ignoring by the public prosecutor of judicial sessions in which Kantsara V. D has been compelled to be together with the lawyer, thus payment of the lawyer – hourly and, considering stated, appointment of the defender agrees item 47 CPK of Ukraine. The decision of Lenin district court of Luhansk from 13.11.2009y. It has illegally been refused satisfaction of the petition of Kantsara V. D from 13.11.2009y. Ref. № 360/1 about elimination of lawyer Skachkova D.V. from participation in criminal case and appointment of the defender at the expense of the state. ((901)77). Moreover, it agree inquiries on criminal case movement ((844)57), 11/16/2009 of year, the public prosecutor has not allowed Kantsara V. D to address with the petition to court about execution of a drive of witnesses – without the lawyer. Thus, the Office of Public Prosecutor deliberately creates conditions for a tightening of consideration of materials of criminal case in reasonable terms, a way tighten considerations of materials of criminal case, default of Laws of the state Ukraine, for the purpose of Kantsara V. D's drawing of additional material and moral harm and causing of physical and sincere sufferings: – Because of necessity of visiting of judicial sessions; – Because of impossibility to carry out the right to a freedom of movement; – Rights to rest, the rights to treatment, the rights to realisation of commercial activity; – Image losses; – Sufferings from sufferings of close people (the wife, the child, parents); Specified, proves to be true Kantsara V. D's medical card ((469)52), Kantsara V. D's numerous references and full inadequacy of answers to them of the state Ukraine power. In connection with the above-stated falsifications of materials of criminal case, infringement of reasonable terms of consideration of criminal case and by that Kantsara V. D's causings of tortures, 13.11.2009y. Ref. №371 Kantsara V. D in Lenin district court of Luhansk the statement for consideration of materials of criminal case №1-1027/07 by a jury (has been put in. – rld.№78). Under the specified statement Lenin district court of Luhansk 16.11.2009y. The decision about refusal in satisfaction of the petition for jury attraction (rld has been taken out. № 79 p. 1, p. 2). By consideration of the specified business with participation of jurymen: – All witnesses on business would be in due time interrogated; – Reasonable terms of consideration of materials of business would not be broken; – There would be no заволокиpartивания considerations of materials of criminal case from outside bodies of Office of Public Prosecutor; – There would be no falsifications of materials of criminal case; – There would be no the criminal case directed on preventing to the reference of Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V. in law-enforcement and judicial bodies, for the purpose of protection of their rights and the rights represented by them of the enterprises: – There would be no the actions of the state Ukraine directed on reyderskiy capture of property of Kantsara V. D. Law-enforcement and judicial bodies extend across Alchevsk and for limits of Luhansk area a false information which подпитывают negative opinion at the population and Kantsara V. D's business partners, obviously knowing about "trust" to this lie of the population of the country. The countries in which the percent of verdicts of "not guilty" makes 0,3 %. The countries in which the President equates the figurant of criminal case to the defendant and condemned ((2603)54 – item 1.4).
Being guided by the Constitution of Ukraine and Laws of Ukraine, judiciary practice of Ukraine, practice of the European court under human rights and criminal case materials it is possible to draw a conclusion that the given criminal case heatedly is illegal and is groundless. All aforesaid is not a single instance and the definitive list of infringements concerning Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V. The above-stated, testifies to deliberate and system actions of investigating bodies, bodies of Office of Public Prosecutor, the judicial bodies acting in official quality – directed on reyderskiy capture of the property of Kantsara V. D, rendering on Kantsara V. D of psychological pressure, and further causings to it a physical pain – application of tortures: – For upholding of the legitimate rights by it, interests of the enterprises, by giving of numerous references in judicial and law enforcement bodies; – For political views distinct from accepted in Luhansk area in 2004y. The specified actions of the power are directed on causing of a physical pain, Kantsara V. D's material and moral harm. Considering the above-stated, we ask the European court to consider under human rights the specified statement without participation of judges of the state of Ukraine as, in the organisation of it, so-called, criminal case, the share of participation of judges (Alchesky city court of Luhansk area – Zalmanov, Guk is great, Zhogina; Luhansk district administrative court – Ostrovsky, IDncharov; the Supreme court of Ukraine).
ІІІ - EXPOSé DE LA OU DES VIOLATION(S) DE LA CONVENTION ALLéGUéE(S) PAR LE REquérant, ainsi que des arguments à l’appui STATEMENT OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION AND / OR RECORD supporting rationale (Voir chapitre ІІІ de la note explicative) (См. Раздел ІІІ Пояснительной заметки)
INFRINGEMENT OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION Convention article 3 provides one of the basic values of a democratic society. She forbids in absolute displays of torture and inhuman, or such which humiliates advantage, the relation or punishment, irrespective of circumstances and behaviour of the victim (Labita against Italy (VP), № 26772/95, paragraph 119, ECHR 2000-IV see). With 06.09.2006y. on 19.10.2006y. Kantsara V. D was in custody in REMAND Starobelska. ((468)51) the Sanction on the maintenance under guards in infringement of jurisdiction and business of the decision of Lenin district court of Luhansk available in materials (competent court) from 09.08.2006y. ((806)46) affirmed Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area (not competent court) (rld.№47). Now, the preventive punishment is changed, and on Kantsara V. D's state of health is released on the security, and a subscription about невыезде. In criminal case materials there is Kantsara V. D's statement from 08.11.2006y. ((1886)48) on its maintenance under guards in a temporary detention facility of Alchevsk and an investigatory insulator of Starobelska. The circumstances stated in the given statement, prove to be true indications of witnesses. Moreover, during Kantsara V. D's finding in REMAND its health has considerably worsened that also proves to be true materials of criminal case and extracts from hospital ((469)52) where Kantsara V. D has been compelled to take place out-patient treatment after REMAND. Understanding that in the conditions of Kantsara V. D's freedom falsifications of materials of criminal case, the inspector Leshchenko O. A finally will reveal. 03.11.2006y. Interrogated the attending physician Kantsara V. D about possibility of the maintenance of Kantsara V. D in the conditions of REMAND (p. 37-38 t. № 5 criminal cases) (rld.№80 стр.1, стр.2) Only under such circumstances could work the criminal plan of law-enforcement and judicial bodies, on рейдерскому to capture of property of Kantsara V. D as in position «from prison» at the person possibilities on protection of the rights and moreover, it much more уступpartивее are considerably limited. Under the influence of huge stress mum and the wife Kantsara V. D have been compelled to sell for nothing the truck crane and its clearing, «under a subscription about not departure» and pledge, costed a hundred times more expensively, than clearing of its cellmates (tyrants, etc.) and in 10 times is more expensive than gangsters, than the murderer in Dmitrovo ((2603)54– item 3.8). Only after an exit from Kantsara V. D's prison has learnt cost of its clearing in the state Ukraine and it became a basis of the big quarrel in a family, in a family where for 25 years of a joint life quarrelled no more than 3 times. From them last was the largest after which its marriage has appeared under the threat. Anniversary – 25 years of a joint life – has dropped to Kantsara V. D's stay in prison – 10.10.2006y. Ways which deprive its person of freedom, fall outside the limits that element of suffering and the humiliation connected with the certain form of the lawful relation or punishment. According to item 3 of the Convention the state should provide the maintenance of the person under guards on such conditions which answer a principle of respect for human advantage that the way and a method of execution did not cause it sincere suffering and torments which exceed the level of suffering corresponding to holding in custody and that having looked at practical conditions of holding in custody its health and conditions have been up to the mark provided. (The decision on business “Kudla проти Polshch і” (VP), statement №30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI) see. Practice of the European court under human rights establishes that illegal or without sufficient on that of the bases the premise of the person in TEMPORARY DETENTION or in REMAND is subject to qualify as torture that is provided item 3 of the Convention on protection of human rights and basic freedom (see the decision on business «Lind against Russia», the statement №25664/05). Kantsara V. D's personal inspection at an illegal search 06.05.2006y. Has been organised by officials of the state Ukraine so that to deliver maximum humiliations, a pain and sufferings, Kantsara V. D's indicative-unpunished actions. On videorecording it is visible that the far-fetched purpose of search of keys is reached for 24 seconds, and the rest of the time the state Ukraine, through tax militia applies unjustified physical influence on Kantsara V. D, by suffocation, hand-wringing, linkages that is tortures.
INFRINGEMENT OF ARTICLE 6 OF SECTION №1 OF THE CONVENTION The applicant considers that the state Ukraine breaks article 6 of section 1 of the Convention as, everyone has the right at definition of its civil rights and duties or by consideration of any criminal charge shown to it, to fair public trial of business in reasonable term the independent and impartial court created on the basis of the law. So, from the date of criminal case excitation has passed seven years, and in March, 2010 – 4 years from the date of its falsification by the inspector Leshchenko O. A and Safonovym I.B.actually, in judicial bodies (Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area, and then, Lenin district court of Luhansk ) given, so-called, criminal case is considered since April 2007года and on the present. Judicial sessions in Leninsk district court of Luhansk , as a rule, pass 1-2 sessions in 3-9 months. For example, after judicial session 26.12.2008y., the next session has been appointed on 16.09.2009y. Except tactics of psychological, physical and moral influence regarding failure of the judicial sessions appointed the judge – March-April or May-June 2008года, etc., Office of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk area have been applied other Jesuit methods, when in the answers the assistant to the public prosecutor of Luhansk area Taktashov ref. № 09-4244-06 from 09.07.2009y. Supplies the false information on absence of falsification of materials of criminal case, the following date judicial session – 21.07.2009y., compelling thereby, Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V. to arrive 21.07.2009y. In Lenin district court of Luhansk . With the assistance of ОО «Luhansk remedial group» in the given occasion the statement, that the judge of Lenin district court of Luhansk 21.07.2009г has been drawn up. Is in holiday and judicial session did not appoint. ((894)81). On Kantsara V. D's given fact in law-enforcement and other state structures the statement ref. №264 from August, 03rd, 2009 about commission of crime as item 97 CPK of Ukraine (rld has been put in. № 81). On the facts stated in the statement, appropriate reaction has not followed. The specified testifies to system character of aspiration of the power, using lawlessness of the citizen of Ukraine, in addition to influence it – for the purpose of demonstration of its lawlessness in the state Ukraine and access preventing to the judicial and law-enforcement power. To lawlessness of the citizen of Ukraine as testifies Actually, in judicial bodies of the state of Ukraine (Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area, and then, Lenin district court of Luhansk ) given, so-called, criminal case is considered since April 2007года and on the present. According to the inquiry on criminal case movement ((844)57), in Alchevsk city court of Luhansk area it has been spent seven judicial sessions on the given criminal case – 4/17/2007, 5/14/2007, 5/30/2007, 8/6/2007, 8/7/2007, 9/10/2007, 10/9/2007 of year. In Lenin district court of Luhansk the given criminal case has arrived 10/25/2007 of year and has been transferred for consideration to judge Taranovoj E.P. to whom business about illegality of a search under Kantsara V. D's complaint from 26.05.2006г earlier has been transferred. The first слушанье criminal case in Leninsk district court of Luhansk has been appointed on 12/13/2007 of year. To the present the Lenin district court of Luhansk had been appointed 42 judicial sessions ((844)57). Judicial sessions in Leninsk district court of Luhansk , as a rule, pass 1-2 sessions in 3-9 months. For example, between judicial sessions 26.12.2008y. And 16.09.2009y. Has passed 9 months that nothing обоснованно. From them, have not been spent in full or broken, it agree Inquiries on movement of criminal case from 20.01.2010y. ((844)57): – Absence of Office of Public Prosecutor of 8 judicial sessions; – Absence of the inspector of Leshchenko O. A. 5 judicial sessions; – Absence of the civil Claimant 1 judicial session; – Absence of witnesses of charge of 13 judicial sessions. Total 27 judicial sessions from 42 have been actually broken by law-enforcement and judicial bodies of the state Ukraine, on the others 15 judicial sessions have been interrogated 10 witnesses of charge. The judge of Lenin district court of Luhansk for the purpose of the termination of consideration of criminal case and decision removal, counting on that witnesses of charge will be delivered – repeatedly appointed successively some sessions in March-April, May-June 2008y. To end consideration of materials of criminal case. In turn the Office of Public Prosecutor these days declared far-fetched oral taps of the judge, then written taps moved next day and by that, the quantity in Leninsk district court of Luhansk has made 42 judicial sessions. ((1419) 63), ((1343)62). The duty of realisation of justice without delays, is the main duty of competent authorities (the decision on business «Mazurenko проти Ukra§ni», the statement №14809/03 see). At attraction as accused Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V. and the more so their detention, by a consequence had been broke a legal procedure, the rights of the citizen provided by the Constitution of Ukraine and the Convention on protection of human rights and basic freedom which contain penal act, namely item 127 of the Criminal code of Ukraine (further CK Ukraine) are broken. Violation of Article 237 of Criminal Procedural Code
of Ukraine.
Infringement of article 237 of the criminally-remedial code of Ukraine. Questions which are found out by the judge at a preliminary legal investigation. In the business which has arrived from the public prosecutor, the judge finds out concerning each of accused following questions: 1) whether jurisdiction has put to court, on consideration to which it has arrived; 2) whether there are no bases for closing of business or its stop; 3) whether the bill of particulars according to requirements of the present Code is made; 4) whether there are bases for change, no cancellation or preventive punishment election; 5) whether it has been admitted at excitation of business, manufacture of inquiry or a pretrial investigation of such infringements of requirements of the present Code without which elimination has put cannot be appointed to proceeding. Under the petition of the public prosecutor accused, its defender or the lawful representative, the victim or its representative the judge finds out also a question on, whether there are no bases for bringing to criminal liability of other persons. In Alchevsk city court of Luhansk area and in Leninsk district court of Luhansk preliminary judicial consideration deliberately has not been spent and the questions provided by item 237 CPK of Ukraine have not been studied, namely: – Whether there are bases for criminal case excitation; – Whether re-registration PEF "Vector" has been spent; – Whether there was a cancellation the certificate of the payer of VAT PEF "Vector" on the beginning of the incriminated period; – Whether obviously illegal decision of Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area on cancellation of re-registration PEF "Vector" from 05.08.2003г is executed.; – Whether there is in business an inquiry from the state register about condition PEF "Vector" and PEF "Avers"; – Whether the inquiry from uniform register STA of Ukraine about date of cancellation of the certificate of the payer of the VAT which contrary to the bill of particulars has been cancelled last afternoon the incriminated two-year period has been received. – Whether those persons are involved as accused, the question on Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V.'s accessory to the officials responsible for delivery of the accounting reporting in bodies has not been studied BEND. The court of the state Ukraine had no right without finding-out of the circumstances set forth above, to accept to consideration the given criminal case. At proceeding carrying out in Leninsk district court of Luhansk have not found acknowledgement of circumstance and the facts listed in Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V.'s bill of particulars According to item 6 of item 2 of the criminally-remedial code of Ukraine criminal case cannot be raised, and the brought action is subject to the termination behind absence in act of structure of a crime. Article 22 of the criminally-remedial code of Ukraine provides all-round, full and objective research of circumstances of business where it is necessary to reveal both convicting, and justifying accused, and also circumstances softening and aggravating its responsibility. Objectivity is expressed in the impartial, unbiassed and diligent analysis of circumstances of business and the proofs collected on it by persons in which manufacture there is a criminal case and which remedial decisions make on it. All above-stated confirms that on the given criminal case act of which fulfilment defendants Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V. are accused, the crime structure is absent. The bill of particulars made by the former inspector of Leshchenko O. A and the proof, extracted during a pretrial investigation have fictitious character and can be qualified under item 364 and 365 CK Ukraine – abusing and excess of the power and office powers. Actions of an investigation team and the persons who have supported the bill of particulars, it is possible to qualify as the organised criminal grouping created on purpose завладения private property by means of its confiscation. Being guided by the Constitution and Laws of Ukraine, judiciary practice of Ukraine, practice of the European court under human rights and criminal case materials it is possible to draw a conclusion that the given criminal case heatedly is illegal and is groundless, with application of illegal measures – psychological and moral influence, tortures, material harm, falsifications of materials and the criminal case facts that would not be possible at participation in consideration of criminal case of jurymen. Till now, the state Ukraine does not define Kantsara V. D's right about presence or absence of fault.
ІV - exposé relatif aux prescriptions de l’article 35 § 1 DE LA CONVENTION STATEMENT UNDER ARTICLE 35 § 1 of the Convention
Autres décisions (énumérées dans l’ordre chronologique en indiquant, pour chaque décision, sa date, sa nature et l’organe – judiciaire ou autre – l’ayant rendue) Other decisions (in a chronological order, with instructions on each of them of date of acceptance, the legal nature, and also body (judicial or other) which has made this decision. We had been made numerous complaints and the statements specified above. Decision-making on the specified infringements judicial and law enforcement bodies of the state of Ukraine illegally заволокиpartивается that leads to essential infringements of articles of the Convention on protection of human rights and the basic freedom. Dispos(i)ez-vous d’un recours que vous n’avez pas exercé? Si oui, lequel et pour quel motif n’a-t-il pas été exercé? Whether there are any other means of internal protection which you did not use? If yes, specify, why. In the state Ukraine there is no possibility to address in appeal or cassation instance on infringements of human rights as on causing of tortures, as, till now заволокиpartивается consideration of criminal term in reasonable terms, and concerning illegal refusal in jury attraction (слд.79 Документ №2 (844)) as, the made definition will not be appealed against.
V - EXPOSé DE L’OBJET DE LA REQUêTE ET PRéTEntions provisoires pour une satisfaction equitable STATEMENT OF THE SUBJECT OF THE STATEMENT AND THE PRELIMINARY SIZE FAIR SATISFACTION. Owing to infringement of article 6 paragraph 1 of the Convention and article 1 of the first report applicant Kantsara Valery Dmitrievich is deprived the right peacefully to own property belonging to it and since 1997 is compelled to address in various state law-enforcement and judicial bodies, i.e., to the state structures which the actions have deliberately created infringements of the rights of the Applicant and the rights of the enterprises which interests it represented throughout all time In the state Ukraine of an expert for the creditor and the Applicant – REMAND ((2603)54 – item 1.2) or removal of the illegal decision ((301) 82 answer 20). Only from 26.03.08 on 31.12.2009y. 431 reference which have been directed in one or more 20 addresses (has been directed to Kantsara V. D's various state law-enforcement and judicial bodies – rld.№83). Since 1997 number of references about infringement of the rights of Kantsara V. D – as citizen and as creditor it is estimated tens thousand. In connection with illegal actions judicial and Kantsara V. D's law enforcement bodies essential material and moral harm is done. The judge and the public prosecutor who already after interrogation of fictitious witnesses Thunderous and Ore, has said «To me here all clearly», assuming that the given criminal case will leave on supplementary examination that did not correspond to our opinion – about necessity of all-round consideration of criminal case, for the purpose of decision-making both concerning Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V., and concerning organizers of the given criminal case, what we repeatedly declared in court (an audio record of judicial considerations of criminal case by system "Обериг" ("/Записи%20судебных%20заседаний%20Лен%20суда/12_05_2008___22_05_2008___26_12_2008/OberigR.exe">(469)84) and "Tuning fork" (rld. № 36). The judge and the public prosecutor precisely know that Kantsara V. D is not guilty. In materials of criminal case there is no document which would confirm Kantsara V. D's fault. Kantsara V. D cannot confirm it, but one judge has literally told «I that the fool, to condemn the innocent person». Kantsara V. D is absolutely assured of the innocence and consequently the done moral harm specified in more low resulted points, is subject to a full and fair satisfaction.
The moral harm caused by Kantsara V. D by law-enforcement and judicial bodies, consists in: – Considerable deterioration of a state of health of Kantsara V. D that proves to be true a medical card ((469)52) which has come out stress from illegal actions of the power of the state Ukraine (torture), infringement of reasonable terms of disposal of legal proceeding, refusal in attraction by consideration of criminal case of a jury; – Infringements of the power of the state Ukraine, Kantsara V. D's rights at drawing up of documents which have formed the basis for carrying out of an illegal search (the official report of Kovalenko ((851)85). In the first fact-finding version of criminal case, in first two volumes of criminal case, Kantsara V. D's surname was not mentioned in general; – Carrying out of an illegal search and not consideration of the statement for search carrying out, than are broken reasonable terms of a legal investigation; – At carrying out of an illegal search on Kantsara V. D physical and psychological influence, as demonstration of omnipotence of law enforcement bodies and lawlessness of the person in the state Ukraine (rld has been rendered. № 42): At acquaintance with the decision about search carrying out; Infringement of norms CPK of Ukraine at dredging carrying out; Application indicative, nothing of the well-founded and illegal measures of physical influence (tortures) at personal inspection carrying out, especially, after withdrawal of keys. – From full ignoring of the authorities of the state Ukraine on our references about illegality of carrying out of a search, about falsifications of materials of criminal case and others above-stated that has led to essential infringement of reasonable terms of disposal of legal proceeding ((501)76); – From full ignoring of the authorities of the state Ukraine on our references about illegal switching-off of a building of Kantsara V. D located to the address: Alchevsk, avenue of Metallurgists, 48 that has led to essential moral harm; – From impossibility, in connection with illegal restriction of the right on free movement, departure for treatment – an interdiction of the judge of Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area of Guka ((890) 86); – To impossibility to take out a family on rest, including abroad because there is a subscription about невыезде (including, an interdiction of the judge of Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area of Guka), which as, interferes with Kantsara V. D's commercial activity both in territory of Ukraine, and behind its limits, in connection with essential infringements of reasonable terms of disposal of legal proceeding. ((890) 86 – inquiry which interferes passport period of validity); – To loss of business reputation, in communication by the false data extended on the city of Alchevsk. So, for example: Kantsara V. D have brought from Kyiv in handcuffs that has not found the acknowledgement in indications of witnesses, by consideration of materials of business in court; 03.11.2009y. Car PEZHO 607 ВВ 2310АР has blocked entrance to gate of a building of Kantsara V. D. On Kantsara V. D's remark, the driver of the car here has offered additional "troubles" and has asked: – «If (Kantsara V. D) has not enough of them, he to it will add them» that in addition testifies to regular distribution by tax militia and other law enforcement bodies since 2006 of a false information which does moral harm of reputation of Kantsara V. D. 12.11.2009y. The situation specified above has repeated. The specified situations have been stated Kantsara V. D. 13.11.2009y. In session of Lenin district court of Luhansk . On this message of appropriate reaction of Lenin district court of Luhansk has not followed; – In TEMPORARY DETENTION Alchevsk Kantsara V. D sleeping accessories, means of personal hygiene have not stood out, in помывке a bath (soul) refused. In the chamber the mattress represented an insanitary heap of cotton wool. It was impossible to touch a pillow because of its insanitary condition and obvious signs of use by her faces in their detention for abusing alcohol. Only after the adaptation of a polyethylene package under a pillowcase for a pillow, and for lack of other possibilities, Kantsara V. D has been compelled to use it. In the chamber there were bugs. – In illegal switching-off of Open Company "ЛЭО" within four years of the electric power to a building belonging on the right of a private property of Kantsara V. D in which shop CHPF "Каллиста" where, for lack of the stationary electric power, shop collective, and including, Kantsara V. D as its owner, moral and material harm, in the form of claims of buyers for deenergizing of power station, cash desks, failure of the software, essential decrease in the income, plunder of the IDods constantly test during deenergizing of the electric power, essential decrease in assortment (frosts, мороженного, half-finished products) is partially located. The shop collective at a closing stage that is essentially reflected in Kantsara V. D's financial position and by that, does it essential material and moral harm. ((898)87), ((400)88). Illegal definition of the Supreme court of Ukraine from 18.11.2009г became result of the reference of Kantsara V. D in judicial bodies of the state of Ukraine, for the purpose of protection of the legitimate rights and interests. Taken out without attraction of a jury which it is illegal and it was groundless manufacture on business (rld is closed. № 82 answer 20). It was required to judicial system of Ukraine more than three years to define Kantsara V. D the private businessman whom it, never was and is not now that proves to be true the inquiry from the Uniform state register of legal bodies and physical persons-businessmen from 28.12.2009y. №856758 ((301)89 answer №21) and on this false basis to close manufacture on business. Thus, not observance of reasonable terms of a legal investigation, torture, absence of jurymen allow Open Company " Luhansk Energy Association " and state Ukraine state structures meaningly to put Kantsara V. D. Material harm which is equivalent to moral harm; – Impossibility to complete apartment, in belonging on the right of a private property of Kantsara V. D a building, to the address: Alchevsk, avenue of Metallurgists, 48 in connection with absence of the stationary electric power. The given apartment Kantsara of Century Д built for the a family, planned an interior of a children's room, a room for visitors where it would be convenient to meet friends. Kantsara V. D has no possibility to give the proof, but the facts specified more low as took place and have done additional material and moral harm: "Compassionate" teachers at school did not miss possibility to find out from the daughter Kantsara V. D where many know it as the participant and the winner of the numerous school, city, regional, republican Olympic Games – «Where your daddy?» ((896)55). The same questions are set and now that would be impossible with the assistance of jurymen in consideration of criminal cases. At mother Kantsara V. D the neurosis which has entailed irritation of an integument therefore, on its body through clothes were visible numerous bloody проступления has developed; In illegal arrest in Kantsara V. D's building, to the address: Alchevsk, avenues of Metallurgists, 48 were plundered building materials, tools, up to canisters, a hose etc.; Attempts завладения by one of premises of a building of Kantsara V. D to the address were made: Alchevsk, avenue of Metallurgists, 48; In 2006 were sonorous to the wife Kantsara V. D with the offer of purchase of its summer residence, apartment which actually, at that point in time, were not on sale that testifies to loss of business image of Kantsara V. D at townspeople of Alchevsk and formation by law enforcement bodies at townspeople of Alchevsk of opinion on Kantsara V. D's guilt that is not compatible to business reputation. I consider that the size of moral harm and a fair satisfaction is equivalent to the material harm put by Kantsara V. D, as to the citizen, the private person and the representative of the enterprises, and as, for its political views which distinct from are accepted in Luhansk area – actions and state Ukraine inactivity, regarding preventing of appropriate consideration of the statements submitted it in law-enforcement, judicial and state structures, and on 31.12.2009y. Makes 271264940 UAH. That is equivalent, agree course NBU on 26.01.2010y. (11,2748 UAH. For 1 euro) – 24059401 euro (rld.№93). The specified sums of a satisfaction I consider fair. Actually moral harm considerably exceed the specified sum, thus dear court I ask to consider that in Ukraine there is a large quantity of infringements of human rights, at the same time, to us one case of reception concerning a fair satisfaction in the sum 1млн is known only. 981 thousand UAH – the trade-union active worker and the known legal expert in Poltava on similar circumstances. (rld.№90)
Detailed calculation and the specified sum of a fair satisfaction will be given at date of consideration of the given statement.
VІ AUTRES INSTANCES INTERNATIONALES TRAITANT OU AYANT TREINé L’AFFAIRE THE STATEMENT CONCERNING PROCEDURES IN OTHER INTERNATIONAL INSTANCES
20. Avez-vous soumis à une autre instance snternationale d’enquête ou de règlement les griefs énoncés dans la présente requête? Si oui, fournir des indications détaillées à ce sujet. Whether you made the stated your complaints in any other international instances for investigation or settlement? If yes, state details.
In any international instances of the complaint the applicant did not move.
VII - PIECES ANNEXEES LIST OF DOCUMENTS переpartень прилагаемых документов (PAS D'ORIGINAUX, UNIQUEMENT DES COPIES) (NO ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS, ONL Y PHOTOCOPIES) (ПРИЛАГАЙТЕ НЕ ОРИГИНАЛЫ ДОКУМЕНТОВ, А ИСКЛЮPARTИТЕЛno.НО КОПИИ) (Voir chapitre VII de la note explicative. Joindre copie de toutes les decisions mentionnees sous ch.IV et VI ci- avant. Se procurer, au besom, les copies necessaires, et, en cas d'impossibilite, expliquer pourquoi celles-ci ne peuvent pas etre obtenues. Ces documents ne vous seront pas retournes.) (See Part VII of the Explanatory Note. Include copies of all decisions referred to in Parts IV and VI above. If you do not have copies, you should obtain them. If you cannot obtain them, explain why not. No documents will be returned to you.) (См. Раздел VII Пояснительной заметки. Приложите копии всех решений, CKазанных в Разделах IV и VI заявления. Если Вы не располагаете копиями, Вам необходимо полуpartить их. Если Вы не можете полуpartить их, объясните, поpartему. Документы не будут Вам возвращены.)
Documents found on the enclosed CD-ROM 1. Powers of attorney from PEF "Kallista", PEF "Promsnab", PEF "Promresursy", PEF "Shopping centre", PEF "Dealine" on Kantsara V. D ((805)1); 2. The power of attorney from 03.01.2004y. (rld.№2); 3. The power of attorney from 01.09.2004y. ( Документ2 rld.№ (221)3); 4. The statement for excitation of criminal case from 03.12.2004года (rld.№4 стр.1, стр.2); 5. The statement for excitation of criminal case from 05.12.2004года (rld.№5 стр.1, стр.2); 6. The statement from 24.01.2005года about granting of the information on consideration of the statement for excitation of criminal case from 03.12.2004y. (rld.№6 стр.1, стр.2, стр.3); 7. The statement for excitation of criminal case from 19.04.2005года (rld.№7 стр.1, стр.2, стр.3); 8. The statement for excitation of criminal case from 25.06.2005года (rld.№8 стр.1, стр.2, стр.3, стр.4); 9. The answer from secretary of the President of Ukraine from 02.03.2005y. №03-02/464 (rld.№9); 10. The answer from secretary of the President of Ukraine from 02.03.2005y. №03-02/464 (rld.№10); 11. The answer from the State Office of Public Prosecutor of Ukraine from 11/19/2004 of year №07/1-r (rld.№11); 12. The answer from Office of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk area from 16.02.2005y. №7/1-3136-05 (rld.№12); 13. The answer from Office of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk from 21.02.2005y. №26вих (rld.№13); 14. The answer from the State Office of Public Prosecutor of Ukraine from 17.03.2005y. ³07/1/1r (rld.№14); 15. The answer from Office of Public Prosecutor the Red Beam from 22.02.2005y. №07-107 vh-05 (rld.№15); 16. The answer from Office of Public Prosecutor of Alchevsk from 03.08.2005y. №10/70-3384 (rld.№16); 17. The photos executed after the deliberate has fallen the belonging Kantsara V. D's is built in-attached premise to the address: Alchevsk, avenue of Metallurgists, 48 ((2603) 17 – п. 6.1, 6.2., 6.3, 6.4); 18. Internet articles about elections in 2004 of the President of Ukraine (rld.№18); 19. The certificate №1 from 14.02.2009y. ( Фото40а cлд. (210) №19); 20. Bojko I.M.'s statement and Fighting Century Н from 10.09.2006y. ( Фото 4 и 5 cлд. (234) №20); 21. Bojko I.M.'s statement and Fighting Century Н from 10.08.2007y. ( Фото 4 и 5 cлд. (234) №21); 22. The decision of the inspector of Leshchenko O. A from 25.03.2006y. (rld.№22 стр.1, стр.2); 23. The documents, testifying that re-registration PEF "Vector" is not carried out ((449)23); 24. The decision from 30.01.2004y. The inspector FROM Brjankovsky ID PDI Chaloj L.F. about criminal case excitation №0091/04 (rld.№24); 25. The decision about criminal case excitation №10/04/8017 from 25.05.2004y. (rld.№25); 26. The decision about criminal case excitation №10/04/8017 from 25.05.2004y. (rld.№26); 27. The decision about a business direction on подследственности from 20.05.2004y. – list case 3том 1 criminal case (rld.№27); 28. The decision about criminal case association in one manufacture from 15.06.2004y. (list case5 volume 1 – (rld.№28); 29. Complaints to the decision from 25.04.2006y. About excitation of criminal case from Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V. ((889)29); 30. Specification under the complaint from 21.12.2006y. From Kantsara V. D ((889)30); 31. The decision of Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area from 25.12.2006y. – Kantsara V. D's complaint to the decision from 25.05.2004y. About criminal case excitation it is left without satisfaction. ((905)31 – p. 215-216 t. № 5 criminal cases); 32. Definition of Appeal court of Luhansk area from 16.02.2007y. – the decision Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area from 25.12.2006y. It has been left without change, Kantsara V. D's appeal complaint – without satisfaction ((905)32 – p. 217-218 t. № 5 criminal cases); 33. Kantsara V. D and Kantsara Z.I.'s passports for travel abroad ((151)33); 34. The decision of inspector Safonova I.B. about announcements of search accused from 31.07.2006y. ((851)34); 35. The certificate of documentary check not eligible to travel abroad №184/23/30921623 from 09.08.2006y. PEF "Avers" concerning observance of requirements of tax laws on payment of the tax to the added cost (further the VAT) from 01.10.2002y. On 30.06.2003y. ((451) 35); 36. Audio records of judicial sessions in Leninsk district court of Luhansk . System "Tuning fork" ("Strasb_1/Записи%20судебных%20заседаний%20Лен%20суда/Остальные%20записи%20на%20камертоне/camertonecd.exe">(863)36); 37. The petition of lawyer Rubana, for Safonova I.B.'s attraction to the criminal liability ((863)37); 38. The decision about carrying out of an illegal search from 03.06.2006y. (слд.№38, дело П-202/07 или 1-77/09 (553)); 39. The power of attorney which has been given out by Kantsara V. D addressed to Marijchuk N.V. ((3439)39); 40. Kantsara V. D's complaint from 26.05.2006y. On the decision about carrying out of an illegal search and on actions of the senior inspector of branch of ORES FROM NANOMETER STA in Leshchenko O. A's Luhansk area, the assistant to the public prosecutor of Luhansk area Garpenjuka A.V. as chapter 22 of item 234 CPK of Ukraine. (Business № 1-77/09 (earlier П-202/07) is in manufacture of Lenin district court of Luhansk ) (слд.№40, документ №1, дело П-202/07 или 1-77/09 (553)); 41. The decision of Lenin district court of Luhansk from 25.12.2008y. About transfer of criminal case for execution it agree item 315 CPK of Ukraine in FROM Office of Public Prosecutor of Luhansk area ((496)41); 42. Video of the illegal search spent by law enforcement bodies 06.05.2006y. – (rld.№42); 43. Sentences about attraction of workers of tax militia of Alchevsk by Leshchenko O. A, Sharojkina R. S and Chivilenko I.V. to the criminal liability ((220)43); 44. Documents on ГП «the Krivorozhsky heating plant» ((1001)44); 45. Representation of inspector Safonova I.B. about election of a preventive punishment in the form of imprisonment ((362)45); 46. The decision of Lenin district court of Luhansk from 09.08.2006y. ((806)46); 47. The decision from 08.09.2006y. Alchevsky city court of Luhansk area about election concerning Kantsara V. D of a preventive punishment in the form of imprisonment (rld.№47); 48. The statement from 11/8/2006 of year ((1886)48); 49. The report of detention of the person which is suspected of commission of crime from 9/6/2006 ((902)49); 50. The reference of inspector Safonova I.B. from 06.09.2006y. Addressed to the chief of Alchevsky ID PDI of Ukraine in Luhansk area for Kantsara V. D's premise in TEMPORARY DETENTION (rld.№50); 51. A photo of an investigatory insulator of Starobelsk, Luhansk area and the inquiry from 19.10.2006y. About a finding in REMAND ((468)51); 52. Kantsara V. D's medical card ((469)52); 53. Page 17 t. № 5 criminal cases – the certificate of reception-transfer of money resources, as pledge for Kantsara V. D's clearing from under guards (rld.№53); 54. The publications of mass-media characterising legislative, executive and judicial branches of the power of the state Ukraine ((2603)54); 55. Reading and writing of the daughter of Kantsara V. D ((896)55); 56. Malikovoj A.A.'s cardiogramme from 28.10.2009года (rld.№56); 57. The inquiry on criminal case movement №1-44/10r given out by Lenin district court of Luhansk from 1/20/2010 ((844)57); 58. Decisions of Lenin district court of Luhansk from 06.06.2008y., 24.06.2008y. And from 06.10.2009y. About a drive of witnesses, and as Kantsara V. D's statements for a drive of witnesses and the answer of the head of department of Luhansk municipal IDvernment PDI of Ukraine in Luhansk area ((891)58); 59. The decision of Lenin district court of Luhansk about a drive from 1/18/2010 of year ((891)59); 60. A photo of sending of decisions of Lenin district court of Luhansk about a drive from 1/18/2010 of year ((891)60); 61. A photo of the fiscal checks testifying to sending of decisions of Lenin district court of Luhansk about a drive from 1/18/2010 of year (rld.№61); 62. The petition concerning taps by Office of Public Prosecutor of the judge ref. №4 from 28.03.2008y. (1343 62); 63. The petition concerning taps by Office of Public Prosecutor of the judge ref. №8 from 14.04.2008y. (1419 63); 64. The statement ref. № 360 from 09.11.2009y. ((500)64); 65. The statement of the assistant to the public prosecutor of Lenin area of Luhansk Coastal (rld.№65); 66. Statements of witnesses Gromovoj E.I. and Rudoj J.I. ((842)66); 67. The answer of executive Committee of Brjankovsky city council that registration of changes in Charter PEF "Vector" is not spent (volume. 1 list case 56) (rld.№67); 68. Charter PEF of "Avers" ((rld.№68); 69. Cards of samples of signatures in tax departments on director PEF of "Avers" Izvarinu J.N. (list case 54-57 volume №5 (слд.№69, Документ №1 (838))); 70. The bill of particulars ((2681)70); 71. An estimation of property of Kantsara V. D which is actually underestimated several times (t. № 3 p. 214-261) ((477)71); 72. A photo of building of a building to the address: Alchevsk, avenue of Metallurgists 48 and shop ((2573)72); 73. Negotiations on rent of a building of Kantsara V. D (rld.№73); 74. Inquiries from the State automobile inspection №3588 from 08.07.2006y. (rld.№74); 75. Inquiries from bureau of technical inventory from 05.07.2006y. Ref. № 2450/7/26-15 (rld.№75); 76. Kantsara V. D's statement from 24.11.2009y. Ref. № 389-1, directed to various state structures of the state of Ukraine, as item 97 CPK of Ukraine under item 127 CK of Ukraine – application of tortures, 162 CK Ukraine – illegality of a search of dwelling, 365 CK Ukraine – office forgery, 366 CK Ukraine – excess of office powers ((501)76); 77. The petition for appointment of the defender agrees item 47 CPK of Ukraine and by that, refusal in protection by the lawyer from 13.11.2009y. Ref. № 360/1 submitted Kantsara V. D in Lenin district court of Luhansk and the decision of Lenin district court of Luhansk about refusal in satisfaction of the petition of Kantsara V. D from 13.11.2009y. Ref. № 360/1 about elimination of lawyer Skachkova D.V. from participation in criminal case and appointment of the defender at the expense of the state. (901 77); 78. The statement from 13.11.2009y. Ref. №371 about consideration of materials has put a jury (rld.№78); 79. The decision of Lenin district court of Luhansk from 16.11.2009y. About refusal in satisfaction of the petition for jury attraction (слд.79 Документ №2 (844)); 80. The report of interrogation from 03.11.2006y. The attending physician Kantsara V. D about possibility of the maintenance of Kantsara V. D in the conditions of REMAND (p. 37-38 t. № 5 уy. Affairs) (rld.№80 стр.1, стр.2); 81. The statement ref. № 264 Kantsara V. D on the answer of the assistant to public prosecutor Taktashova ref. № 09-4244-06 from 09.07.2009y. (894 81); 82. Definition of the Supreme court of Ukraine from 18.11.2009y. ((301) 82 301 20); 83. The register of outcoming documents of the directed Kantsara V. D in various state structures of the state of Ukraine (rld.№83); 84. An audio record of judicial considerations of criminal case by system "Обериг" ("Записи%20судебных%20заседаний%20Лен%20суда/12_05_2008___22_05_2008___26_12_2008/OberigR.exe">(851)84); 85. Kovalenko V. I's official report from 07.09.2006y. (list case 106 том№3) ((851)85); 86. The inquiry which has been given out by the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine at registration of the passport in which it is specified that Kantsara V. D was involved in the criminal liability. On стр 402 volume №5 of criminal case judge Guk has not resolved Kantsara V. D and Marijchuk N.V. a trip to a city Raisin 22.05.07года for treatment. (890 86); 87. Statement of claim PEF of "Kallista" to Open Company " Luhansk Energy Association ". A photo from business materials. (t. № 1 p. of 2-8 business №16/87) ((898)87); 88. A photo of shop CHPF "Kallista" located in a building of V. D before switching-off and after ((400)88); 89. The inquiry from the Uniform state register of legal bodies and physical persons-businessmen from 28.12.2009y. №856758 ((301)89); 90. Internet article «to Troy the Poltava trade-union active workers have seized at Ukraine of 2,7 million for mental cruelty» (rld.№90); 91. The administrative claim ref. № 183 from April, 10th, 2009 (rld.№91); 92. Definition of Donetsk appeal administrative court from 22.12.2009y. ((913)92); 93. Calculation of a fair satisfaction as of 31.12.2009y. – table №29 (rld.№93); 94. A detailed statement of circumstances of business (rld.№94); 95. The laser disk assured by the signature of Kantsara V. D.
In case of absence of a laser disk, the present statement with all appendices is to the address – http://ua2424.com/strasb/REQUETE_Zayavlenie.html. Video of the illegal search spent by law enforcement bodies 06.05.2006y., it is possible to download with Video.3gp.html (207мБ);
In case of need to give the Applicant, the documents enclosed on a laser disk in printing, we ask to inform, and they will be given.
VIII- DECLARATIONЕГSIGNATURE DECLARA JJON AND SIGNA JURE ДЕКЛАРАЦИЯ И ПОДПИСno. (Voir chapitre VIII de la note explicative) (See Part VIII of the Explanatory Note)
(См. Раздел VIII Пояснительной заметки) 22. Je declare en toute conscience et loyaute que les renseignements qui figurent sur la presente formule de requite sont exacts. I hereby declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information I have given in the application is correct I meaningly declare that all data presented in this statement are exact.
Lieu/Place/Mecro г. Алчевск, Украина Date/Date/Дата . . . «27» января 2010 года (Signature du/de la requerant(e) ou du/de la representant(e)) (Signature of the applicant or of the representative) (Подпись заявителя или представителя)
The citizen of Ukraine Kantsara V. D.
Дополнения к настоящему иску: – Дополнение №1. (2541) . – Дополнение №2. (238) . – Дополнение №3. (239) . – Дополнение №4. (240) . – Дополнение №5. (241) . – Дополнение №6. (243) . Другие заявления в Европейский суд по правам человека: – Заявления о беззакониях (163)правоохранительных и судебных органов совместно с частной фирмой ООО «Луганское энергетическое объединение» (Канцара В.Д.–ООО "ЛЭО"). – Заявления о беззакониях (2975)правоохранительных и судебных органов совместно с частной фирмой ООО «Луганское энергетическое объединение» (ЧПФ "Каллиста" --- ООО "ЛЭО"). – Заявление в отношении (168) прокурора прокуратуры Луганской области Абашидзе. – Заявление в отношении (169) прокурора прокуратуры Луганской области Такташова. Видео незаконного обыска, проведенного правоохранительными органами 06.05.2006г. скачать видео (915). |
Копия верна Канцара В.Д.